Re: My Extra-Attacks/Multiple-Attacks House Rule

RAGNARoK:"...but I'll fill ya in on a few concepts about these Revamp threads and why we are here...."

He RAGNARoK just FYI, on this. I was the original individual that requested that Aunt P put this thread in place for the sole purpose of what we do here to this day.

I have not had as much time as I would like to spend on this site. Family / life and everything else that comes up interceeding and all, the details I will not bore everyone with.

In relation to what you are doing in this thread. I have absolutely no problem with. The whole purpose of this thread is to continue the evolution of a game that should have nether been moth balled but in the end was. I welcome you and everyone else to continue to REVAMP areas of the game that you think need the attention.

The rules in the UPB are refered to constantly as people/ inlcuding said Author of the Book admit that parts were missing/in need of revamping.

The tables in the book that I refered to previously will also need the common sense input from said GM of the day. If members /non members prefer to make their own ruling on this topic then I encourage that as at the end of the day the gambe should be played for the fun of it and if you need to cull/modify/reinvent a rule to better fit your game. Go for it and enjoy.

Even though I may not agree it is an opinion and by the way everyone keep up the good work here.