Powersurge Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I just thought I'd clarify what is meant by innate
> aptitude as, I think it was Tanker who made a
> comment regarding one "learning" innate aptitude.
>
> Innate aptitude is not learned. It is present from
> the get go... part of the person, and not
> something a person can acquire. No amount of
> training or education or experience or performance
> enhancers will ever turn a mediocre or even above
> average person into a Mozart or an Einstein or an
> Ali, because the innate aptitude of such people
> for their particular calling is simply head and
> toe above the rest.
>
> So, in a way, the Fighting score is like the
> Reason score, and determines the degree of success
> a person will enjoy in a particular field.
>
> A warrior deity like Thor is naturally going to
> have an inherent understanding of combat, which
> would enable him to be a impressive fighter
> without ANY training or experience, and which
> would also enable him to pick up, master and
> improve upon learned techniques that much easier.
>
>
> Other people with a low aptitude might, with time
> and dedication, be able to pick up all of the
> skills that a person with a high aptitude could,
> but it is going to be a long painful process and
> at the end of it all such a person is still
> probably going to get beat up by bums on the
> street.
>
> Eg. A person with Feeble Figthing is still a sorry
> excuse for a fighter even if they've somehow
> managed to acquire every martial talent the game
> has to offer. Train them from now till Doomsday,
> no matter. It's like trying to change one's
> genetics. A person has what they have.
>
> The Feeble fighter with every martial talent will
> be better than another Feeble Fighter without any
> martial talents, but fancy techniques aside, they
> will never be as good as someone with an Excellent
> aptitude for fighting that has never received any
> formal training. They simply lack that
> fundamental, "non-acquireable" quality.
>
> As for Cap and Marvel canon; he is one of the
> preeminent HTH combatants of the MU, but it is
> canon that the only techniques he has "mastered"
> are boxing and judo and he is not a consumate
> martial artist a la Batman. It is his superhuman
> athleticism (and a bit of training) that enables
> him to compete with guys like Batman.
>
> Is Cap better than Thor or Herc? All else being
> equal? I highly doubt it.
>
> Is Cap worthy of having a fighting score of
> Amazing? Hell no, IMO. He clearly had NO physical
> aptitude of any kind prior to the super-soldier
> serum -- if he had any, it would have shown itself
> off and he wouldn't have been rejected for
> military service... during WARTIME -- and all of
> the super-steroids in the world aren't going to
> change that to any significant degree... maybe a
> column shift... ir two if one is feeling generous.
> I would say that the only reason he has that in
> the game is because of thoughtless presumption,
> ie. Cap is max human in all physical areas and
> Fighting is listed as a physical attribute,
> therfore Cap must have max. human Figthing.
>
> But even moreso, is Cap worthy of possessing ALL
> of the martial arts talents? Well, does boxing and
> judo encompass all of the martial talents? No, it
> doesn't. And no, he isn't.
As for it not being canon and the limitations on Captain America's fighting skills..as of the last release of The Hardcover Marvel Encyclopedia and the last Avengers OHOTMU, both of which have added fighting ability as one of the categorized index scores, Cap is listed as a 7 (which is defined as MASTER OF ALL KNOWN FORMS OF COMBAT) whle Thor is listed as a 4 (defined as EXPERIENCED FIGHTER). These both being Marvel publications this would then establish these stats as CANON...on top of the immense number of interviews that have been presented throughout the comics world in which writers have defined Cap as the ultimate fighting machine (and in those interviews I have never seen one specify him as the ultimate HUMAN fighting machine, the ultimate human speciman maybe, but as for fighting skill, he is described as the best). Also, yes, the original Handbooks give a meager description to his training, but theygive a handicapped description to many characters that were active at the time, they are a good starting reference point but ultimately the stories (and Marvel Staff) dipicted a different story and thus comes the revised stats. The MU is an evolving entity and stats and histories will change as stories and further info is presented. The game world should reflect these changes as they are presented or fixed.
Also, innate ability does not "trump" learned skills and techniques. Innate ability simply infers that one was born with an apptitude and predisposition towards a certain behavior or skill and gives the individual an initial advantage in a select area, but it is entirely possible thru intense training or schooling for someone with no initial skill to surpass and dwarf the skills of someone who started with that innate skill. Children can be born as musical prodigies with an innate understanding of music and able to play the piano with virtually no formal training yet this does not make them the best piano players in the world by default and in fact there are many superior players that initially started with no understanding of the subject or the instrument but thru diligence and hard work have far surpassed those that were born with thier innate talents. I myself was born with an innate talent for art and at an early age was already drawing very lifelike pictures of people and objects, it is a skill I am proud of, but am I arrogant enough to say that I am better than others because I was born with that skill while others may have had to work a little harder to acquire it...no way. Not every one will have the tendency to become artists, obviously, but some people simply wake up and can do it while others had to hone their skills, but this innate skill of some does not put a ceiling on the ability of others.